soft tissue therapy .com.au
Manual Therapy Conferences and Workshops Massage, Soft Tissue Therapy & Myotherapy Australia- Jobs & rooms for rent
Soft Tissue Therapy Facebook Page Manual therapy equipment for sale
soft tissue therapy .com.au
MENU

HOME RESEARCH ARTICLES GENERAL ARTICLES SEARCH ARTICLES STT eMAG LATEST POLL CALENDAR OF EVENTS DEFINITIONS ABBREVIATIONS LINKS MY FOLDER CONTACT US STT SHOP


MAILING LIST

For up to date info, workshops, new research articles, jobs, sale items, join our mailing list!



soft tissue therapy .com.au

ARTICLE soft tissue therapy .com.au

soft tissue therapy .com.au

Title
Influence of massage, active and passive recovery on swimming performance and blood lactate

Author(s)
Ali Rasooli S, Koushkie Jahromi M, Asadmanesh A, Salesi M.

Published
Apr, 2012

Published In
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2012 Apr;52(2):122-7

Abstract
AIM: Recovery is an important part of athletic training. The aim of this study was to evaluate influences of three methods of recovery including massage, active and passive recovery on blood lactate concentration and subsequent swimming performance of elite swimmers. METHODS: Seventeen professional male swimmers (age:21? 2.4 years, height: 175.35?9.1 cm, weight: 67.66? 11.88 kg) voluntarily participated in this study. Two Swimming trials performed in every session which involved 200 m of front crawl swimming with maximal effort separated by ten minutes interval (recovery) period. Statistical method of repeated measures was used for analysis of data. RESULTS: There was significant difference in blood lactate after three types of recovery (P<0.05). Significant difference was observed between passive and active (P=0.001), passive and massage (P=0.031) and active and massage (P=0.001). Blood lactate decreased after active, massage and passive recovery (blood lactate mean ? SD: 5.72?1.44, 7.10?1.27, 10.94?2.05 mmol/L, respectively). A significant difference was observed between performance time after three type of delivery (P=0.001, F=2.238). Significant differences was observed between passive and active recovery (P=0.003), passive and massage (P=0.001), but no significant difference was observed between performance time after active and massage recovery (P=1.00). CONCLUSION: the results indicated that active recovery was more effective than massage and massage was more effective compared to passive recovery in removing blood lactate. Active and massage recovery were more effective in improving swimming performance than passive recovery.

Further Information   |   Add To My Folder   |   Printable Version

 

SPONSORED LINKS

Portable Thoracic Rack

Sports massage magazine for soft tissue therapists


soft tissue therapy .com.au